Legislation Details

File #: 23-1455   
On agenda: 2/6/2024 Final action: 2/6/2024
Enactment date: Enactment #: Agreement No. 24-069
Recommended Action(s)
Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute "Agreement to Defend Public Officers or Employees, Reservation of Rights, and Non Waiver Agreement" for the employee listed below: Name of Employee Current Position Title of Action Devon Kubota Correctional Officer, Nathaniel Myers Sheriff's Department v County of Fresno
Attachments: 1. Agenda Item, 2. Agreement A-24-069 for Devon Kubota, 3. Exhibit “A” Article 4. Indemnification of Public Employees
DATE: February 6, 2024

TO: Board of Supervisors

SUBMITTED BY: Hollis Magill, Director of Human Resources

SUBJECT: Request to Defend Public Officers or Employees

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
TITLE
Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute "Agreement to Defend Public Officers or Employees, Reservation of Rights, and Non Waiver Agreement" for the employee listed below:

Name of
Employee Current Position Title of Action

Devon Kubota Correctional Officer, Nathaniel Myers
Sheriff's Department v
County of Fresno
REPORT
Description:

The plaintiff alleges that incorrect classification by correctional officers in the Fresno County Jail was the proximate cause of the plaintiffs' injuries. Mr. Kubota was employed with the Sheriff's Department at the times relevant to the allegations in the lawsuit.

Fresno County Claim No.: 10408
Eastern District Court.: 1:22-CV-00173-DAD-HBK
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Myers


ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S):

No alternative action is available because Article 4 (commencing with section 825), Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 3.6 of Title 1 of the Government Code requires the County to indemnify its public employees who timely request such defense.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no increase in Net County Cost associated with the recommended action. Funds to finance the cost of defense are contained in the Department's Org 8925, Risk Management Internal Services Fund. Defense costs are supported by annual budgetary contributions based on actuarial projections.

DISCUSSION:

The California Government Code requires the County to defend its officers and employees who are sued because of their actions while in the course and scope of employment, if they timely request such defense. The County may require officers and employees to agree that the County's rights under the law are protected.

In the above-mentioned action, the employee who has been named in the suit has requested the County to provide...

Click here for full text