Public Works and Planning
9.
Conduct a public hearing; adopt required findings; and conduct public hearing and adopt
Resolution making required findings necessary to approve Mary Avenue Vacation Application
No. V18-02 relating to vacation of public right-of-way of Mary Avenue from the north right-of-way
line of Daleville Avenue, continuing northerly approximately 178 feet, as shown on Vicinity Map.
The Board finds that: 1. The vacation is determined to meet criteria for general vacation
pursuant to Chapter 3 of Part 3 of Division 9 of Streets and Highways Code (collectively
“Vacation Laws”) 2.The right-of-way, other than easement for benefit of Pacific Gas & Electric
Company being retained, is unnecessary for present or prospective public use 3. The
right-of-way is not useful as a nonmotorized transportation facility, pursuant to Section 892 of the
Streets and Highways Code 4. The vacation is consistent with the County General Plan. Subject
property is located less than one mile southwest from the nearest city limits of City of Fresno
CONDUCTED PUBLIC HEARING. NO PUBLIC TESTIMONY RECEIVED. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING. A
MOTION WAS MADE BY VICE CHAIRMAN BRANDAU, SECONDED BY SUPERVISOR QUINTERO, THAT THIS
MATTER BE APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED. THE MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
5 - Mendes, Brandau, Magsig, Pacheco, and Quintero
Ayes:
Resolution No. 20-063
10.
Consent to assignment of Consultant Services Agreement No. 14-668-1 and On-Call Consultant
Agreement No. 17-477-1 by Drake Haglan & Associates, Inc. to Dewberry | Drake Haglan,
retroactive to September 27, 2019; and consent to assignment of On-Call Consultant
Agreement No. 17-477 by Drake Haglan & Associates, Inc. to Dewberry | Drake Haglan,
retroactive to September 27, 2019
A MOTION WAS MADE BY SUPERVISOR QUINTERO, SECONDED BY SUPERVISOR PACHECO, THAT THIS
MATTER BE APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED. THE MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
5 - Mendes, Brandau, Magsig, Pacheco, and Quintero
Ayes:
Agreement No. 14-668-1, Agreement No. 17-477-1
11.
Consider appeal of Planning Commission’s denial of Unclassified Conditional Use Permit
Application (UCUP) No. 3648, proposing to allow construction of a new unmanned wireless
telecommunications facility consisting of a 150-foot lattice tower with associated antennas and
equipment on a 40-foot by 50-foot fenced area on a 1.45-acre parcel in the AE-20 (Exclusive
Agricultural, 20-acre minimum parcel size) Zone District; and if your Board grants the appeal
and overturns the Planning Commission’s denial of UCUP Application No. 3648: a) adopt
Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for Initial Study Application No. 7611 and approved
proposal subject to project Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval; and b) make the
required findings specified in County Zoning Ordinance, Section 873(F) for approval of the
UCUP No. 3648; and c) adopt Resolution approving UCUP No. 3648 for a wireless
communications facility, with staff’s recommended Conditions of Approval. Subject property is
located on west side of South Elm Avenue approximately 1,764 feet north of its nearest
intersection with East Elkhorn Avenue and is located approximately 3.36 miles southeast of the
unincorporated community of Caruthers (SUP. DIST. 4) (APN 042-200-06S) (16629 S. Elm
Avenue, Caruthers, CA)
DELETED