County of Fresno - File #: 17-0966

• File #: 17-0966
• Name: Annex No. 9A 2nd. Reading of Ordinance
• In control: Public Works & Planning
• On agenda: 9/26/2017
• Final action: 9/26/2017
• Enactment #: Ordinance No. 17-015
• Title: Conduct second reading of "An Ordinance of the County of Fresno Levying a Special Tax within Annexation Territory 9A of Countywide Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Police Protection Services) of the County of Fresno" and waive the reading of the proposed Ordinance in its entirety.

Date	Action By	Action	Result
9/26/2017	Board of Supervisors	Conducted Hearings	Pass

DATE: September 26, 2017

TO: Board of Supervisors

SUBMITTED BY: Steven E. White, Director
Department of Public Works and Planning

SUBJECT: Countywide Mello Roos Community Facilities District 2006-01 Annexation No. 9A; Conduct Second Reading of and Adopt Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for Enhanced Police Protection Services in that District.

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
TITLE
Conduct second reading of "An Ordinance of the County of Fresno Levying a Special Tax within Annexation Territory 9A of Countywide Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Police Protection Services) of the County of Fresno" and waive the reading of the proposed Ordinance in its entirety.
REPORT
The recommended action will allow your Board to annually impose a Special Tax on real property located within the Annexation Territory 9A (Annexation 9A) as shown in Annexation Map No. 9A (Exhibit A), County-Wide Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2006-01 (Police Protection Services) (CFD 2006-01) for enhanced police protection services (referred to below as "Police Protection Services") in Tentative Tract No. 4968 (Tract 4968), Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 300-340-11S; in accordance with the California Constitution and California Government Code Section 53311 and following.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S):

If the recommended action is not approved, the County will not be able to levy a special tax for Police Protection Services within Annexation 9A; therefore, the conditions of approval for the subject tract will not have been met.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There will be no Net County Cost associated with the recommended action. All annexation costs are paid by the developers/landowners. The applicant has made an initial deposit of $12,000 to cover costs incurred by the County to conduct Annexation 9A proceedings. The Developer's deposit is in Trust/Special Revenue Fund 0085/subclass 17406. The Developer has entered into agreement with the County to deposit additional funds as necessary to ...