Fresno County CA header
 
File #: 17-1513    Name: SLTS Second Amendmen to Agreement # 10-390
In control: Public Works & Planning
On agenda: 1/23/2018 Final action: 1/23/2018
Enactment date: Enactment #: Agreement No. 10-390-2
Title: Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Second Amendment to Agreement 10-390 with Granite Solid Waste, LLC to continue to operate the Shaver Lake Transfer Station through February 27, 2028.
Attachments: 1. Agenda Item, 2. Agreement A-10-390-2 with Granite Solid Waste, LLC
DATE: January 23, 2018

TO: Board of Supervisors

SUBMITTED BY: Steven E. White, Director
Department of Public Works and Planning

SUBJECT: Second Amendment to Shaver Lake Transfer Station Agreement 10-390

RECOMMENDED ACTION:
TITLE
Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Second Amendment to Agreement 10-390 with Granite Solid Waste, LLC to continue to operate the Shaver Lake Transfer Station through February 27, 2028.
REPORT
On July 13, 2010, the County executed Agreement No. 10-390 for the operation of the Shaver Lake Transfer Station (SLTS) with Granite Solid Waste, LLC (Granite), the Exclusive Service Area Program (ESAP) contractor for Areas 11 and 14, for a term concurrent with the ESAP agreement, which is scheduled to expire on February 26, 2018. The SLTS agreement provides the County the discretion to offer Granite one ten year extension. The recommended action requests approval to amend the term of the SLTS agreement through February 27, 2028, to coincide with the extended term of Granite's amended and successor ESAP agreement, as authorized by the Board on October 31, 2017. This item pertains to District 5.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

1. The Board may choose not to execute the second amendment to the SLTS agreement, and direct staff to return to the Board with a recommendation to close the SLTS; or

2. The Board may direct staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to select a new vendor. However, since there is no revenue stream directly associated with operating the SLTS, and there is no guarantee that the current operator will be the successful proposer, the cost of processing an RFP would need to be absorbed within current General Fund appropriations within Org 4360.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no Net County Cost associated with the recommended action. Granite will be compensated solely from tipping fees collected from users of the SLTS. The minimal administrative work associated with this agenda item is budgeted in the Public Works and ...

Click here for full text