Fresno County CA header
 
File #: 18-0492    Name: noAmendment to Section 4300 of the Master Schedule of Fees, Charges, and Recovered Costs
In control: Internal Services
On agenda: 5/8/2018 Final action: 5/8/2018
Enactment date: Enactment #:
Title: 1. Conduct first hearing to amend the County of Fresno Master Schedule of Fees, Charges, and Recovered Costs Ordinance by amending Section 4300-Information Technology Services, in its entirety, revising fees relating to the recovery of costs of certain information technology services and PeopleSoft Operations provided by the Internal Services Department (ISD) to County departments and other public agencies (the Ordinance); waive the reading of the proposed Ordinance in its entirety, and set the second hearing of the proposed Ordinance, including its requested Board adoption, for June 5, 2018; 2. Designate County Counsel to prepare a fair and adequate summary of the proposed Ordinance; and 3. Direct the Clerk of the Board to post and publish the required summary of the proposed Ordinance in accordance with Government Code Section 25124(b)(1).
Attachments: 1. Agenda Item, 2. Exhibit A - Comparison of Rates, 3. Proposed Ordinance, 4. Ordinance Summary, 5. Additional Information

DATE:                     May 8, 2018

 

TO:                     Board of Supervisors

 

SUBMITTED BY:                     Robert W. Bash, Director of Internal Services/Chief Information Officer

 

SUBJECT:                     Amendment to Master Schedule of Fees, Charges, and Recovered

                     Costs

 

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

TITLE

1.                     Conduct first hearing to amend the County of Fresno Master Schedule of Fees, Charges, and Recovered Costs Ordinance by amending Section 4300-Information Technology Services, in its entirety, revising fees relating to the recovery of costs of certain information technology services and PeopleSoft Operations provided by the Internal Services Department (ISD) to County departments and other public agencies (the Ordinance); waive the reading of the proposed Ordinance in its entirety, and set the second hearing of the proposed Ordinance, including its requested Board adoption, for June 5, 2018;

 

2.                     Designate County Counsel to prepare a fair and adequate summary of the proposed Ordinance; and

 

3.                     Direct the Clerk of the Board to post and publish the required summary of the proposed Ordinance in accordance with Government Code Section 25124(b)(1).

REPORT

The Board’s approval of the recommended actions would enable the Board to consider amending rates in Section 4300, Information Technology Services, of the Master Schedule of Fees, Charges, and Recovered Costs (MSF) based on Internal Services Department (ISD) costs. The rates are used for recovery of costs of ISD staff costs for certain information technology services and PeopleSoft Operations provided to County departments and other public agencies. The Board’s approval of the second and third recommended actions satisfies the legal requirement to publicize these proposed service rates.

 

ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S):

 

The Board may direct staff to use current fees or propose alternative fees which may not recover full costs of services.

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

 

Charging the proposed rates for services rendered to County departments and other public agencies outside the County departments will result in a portion of the revenues needed to operate two separate Internal Service Funds (ISF) for FY 2018-19. Those funds are:

 

                     Fund 1020, Information Technology Services, Org 8905-8908

                     Fund 1030, PeopleSoft Operations, Org 8933

 

DISCUSSION:

 

The two funds mentioned above are managed by the ISD. As ISF organizations, they must recover all operating expenses by charging customers for services ordered and rendered. The rates under discussion were established by estimating the annual operating cost of the components of each of the unique services being offered and then dividing those costs by the projected usage of all customers. The rates indicated are for services utilized by both internal customers (i.e., County departments) and external customers (i.e., other public agencies) and make up a portion of the total revenues collected by the ISF’s.

 

The proposed Ordinance, if adopted by the Board, would update rates for subsections 4301 through and including 4315, 4317, and 4319 through and including 4329. Exhibit A illustrates a comparison between the proposed rates and the corresponding rates for the two preceding budget years for those subsections recommended for change. In some cases, the units of service obtained may be in the thousandths or millionths, therefore recorded to four decimal places. The rounding back to dollars and cents is accomplished at collection time.

 

Below is a brief summary of events that led to changes from prior year rates to the proposed:

 

                     Decreased rates as the volume order of units increased providing lower rates.

                     Decreased VDI (i.e., virtual desktop infrastructure) rates as support services will be provided via remote access.

                     Decreased rates in Application Hosting rate due to a new method of calculation.

                     Increased  rates in SQL(i.e., structured query language)  and Oracle Database rates due to a new method of calculation.

                     Increased pager rates as reductions in total units in use increased unit cost.

                     Increased rates due to increases in staffing costs.

 

The recommended rates, including their calculation, and the methodology applied for cost recovery has been reviewed and approved by the Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector. The proposed fee (rate) changes will take effect 30 days after the second hearing if adopted by the Board.

 

If the recommended actions in this item are approved by the Board, the second hearing will be scheduled for June 5, 2018.

 

ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED AND/OR ON FILE:

 

Exhibit A - Comparison of Rates

Proposed Ordinance

On file with Clerk -Ordinance Summary

 

CAO ANALYST:

 

Juan Lopez